Sunday, January 16, 2011

Ma Hongkui had it right

Communism is a genetic disease that has killed 94 million people. Communism is auto genocidal in nature. To run a civilization properly you have to kill a few thousand commies ever generation in order to prevent them from killing themselves by the millions. You are actually doing them a favor by deterring them. The state that kills a thousand communists saves a million liberal deaths.

Humans evolved in a xenophobic tribal communist environment. We are genetically programmed to be tribal, egalitarian, and xenophobic. We now inhabit a capitalist democracy. Genetics is fundamentally misaligned with the modern world, and these ancient legacy genes cause all our problems.

Xenophobia can never be eliminated because the society that abandons racism is conquered by the societies that do not. Racism is a prisoner's dilemma. Here is an explanation of what a prisoner's dilemma is from Wikipedia;
"Two members of a criminal gang are arrested and imprisoned. Each prisoner is in solitary confinement with no means of communicating with the other. The prosecutors lack sufficient evidence to convict the pair on the principal charge. They hope to get both sentenced to a year in prison on a lesser charge. Simultaneously, the prosecutors offer each prisoner a bargain. Each prisoner is given the opportunity either to: betray the other by testifying that the other committed the crime, or to cooperate with the other by remaining silent. The offer is:
If A and B each betray the other, each of them serves 2 years in prison
If A betrays B but B remains silent, A will be set free and B will serve 3 years in prison (and vice versa)
If A and B both remain silent, both of them will only serve 1 year in prison (on the lesser charge)"
A prisoner's dilemma is a situation where two people would best be served by not snitching on the other guy, but the one who snitches first gets a reduced prison sentence while the one who doesn't goes to jail for years and years. The term prisoner's dilemma can refer to any situation where selling out is the best strategy. Racism is a prisoner's dilemma because the more racist society conquers the less racist society, and the best strategy is to practice racism (like a Zionist) while espousing multiculturalism. It strengthens you and weakens everyone else.

The society that abandons racism is conquered either through immigration, mass migration, or literal warfare by its neighbors. Tolerance is a losing strategy. If you won't be intolerant then you will lose to someone who will. Your options are either (a), be racist, or (b), get conquered by intolerant people. That's it. That's all. Any "third strategy" is really just one of the two in disguise.

Now contrast this genetic tendency with the genetic tendency towards communism. A society can abandon the communist tendency with no apparent harm to its ability to function. All you get is a decreased tendency towards suicidal revolution, and less class envy. Granted, your care for the poor may drop a little. But inequality has never stopped the survival of a nation. Ancient Egypt lasted 3,400 years with slaves and no equality in sight. The Soviet Union tried pure equality and lasted 69 years. Classical Athens had a modest semi-equality that included slaves and lasted 186 years. If anything, more equality means less civilizational survival. It appears that the more oxygen you give the egalitarian / communist impulse the faster it destroys your society.

And there is a reason for this.

Making people more equal actually makes them more envious.

Think about it. If a peasant serves in a lords' castle it is completely impossible for him to even imagine being a lord. But if a middle-class man sees the doctor next door live in a bigger house and have a hotter wife, then it is completely possible for him to imagine a modest change in life style that would make him as rich as a doctor. The distance from a civil servant making $ 50,000 per year to a doctor making $ 180,000 per year is far less than the distance between a peasant making $ 12,000 per year and a lord making $ 50 million per year. It is easier to envision the next higher rung on the later, and therefore easier to hate, and that gives you more social tension rather than less. It's a kind of "narcissism of small differences."

Rather than go back to the jackboot of monarchy, I want human nature to change. I want to find the gene for envy and remove it. It would simply be better if human nature were itself modified to reduce the tendency towards communism. And it will eventually. Eventually either the gene will be removed by gene therapy, or removed by the mass slaughter of repeated communist revolutions. Take your pick. But eventually it will go extinct. And a pill is far better than a mass grave. It may sound like liberalism to propose modifying human nature, but in this case human nature is being modified no matter what. I just want the less painful option.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Don't post under the name Anonymous or your post will be deleted. There is a spam bot using that name and I just delete everything he posts.