Thursday, June 22, 2017

They don't even try to hide it


The Yew York Times is owned by the Jewish Ochs-Sulzberger family.

Per Wikipedia;
In 1896, Adolph Ochs bought The New York Times, a money-losing newspaper, and formed the New York Times Company. The Ochs-Sulzberger family, one of the United States' newspaper dynasties, has owned The New York Times ever since.[40] The publisher went public on January 14, 1969, trading at $42 a share on the American Stock Exchange.[87] After this, the family continued to exert control through its ownership of the vast majority of Class B voting shares. Class A shareholders are permitted restrictive voting rights while Class B shareholders are allowed open voting rights.
The Ochs-Sulzberger family trust controls roughly 88 percent of the company's class B shares. Any alteration to the dual-class structure must be ratified by six of eight directors who sit on the board of the Ochs-Sulzberger family trust. The Trust board members are Daniel H. Cohen, James M. Cohen, Lynn G. Dolnick, Susan W. Dryfoos, Michael Golden, Eric M. A. Lax, Arthur O. Sulzberger, Jr. and Cathy J. Sulzberger.[88]
The have a political section that frequently talks about white genocide called "The Upshot." This article talks about how the future of America is Hispanic.



4 comments:

  1. To play devil's advocate, you might say it is an "upshot," by comparison to other western societies. Oceania is doomed to become a vassal of China and given the Tibetan treatment they could be the most demographically displaced thereafter. Europe has the unequivocally worst set of invasive ethnic groups and the closest proximity to their source. To the point where even technological collapse couldn't save many of them from brutal displacement. MENA ethics are also not known for their appreciation of conquered cultures so you can bank on Europe being obliterated in ways others won't.

    So with all that we've got mestizo invasion of America looking mild by comparison. They aren't as intelligent and are at least a standard deviation more violent, but they do at-least have some European genes and are radically at odds with the second largest problem minority.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I know it sounds crass but it makes me want to start a "white sperm exporting company" to the rest of the world. If women really are as hypergamous as we are told I bet there are billions of African and Mestizo women who would go to the clinic behind their husbands backs. If the world is going to be mixed at least it can be white(ish).

      Delete
  2. The future is going to be full of crass solutions to our impending problems, but I wouldn't suggest whites waste their DNA in that fashion. If you're going to retake your nations, you will need all the average IQ advantage you can get.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I don't know. A single sperm donor can father dozens of children. Some have hundreds.

      Delete