The conventional dichotomy is always framed as educated morality versus Christian morality. One says that humans are infinitely malleable and that a person's sense of social justice or lack thereof is completely the result of their upbringing and education. The other side says that morality comes from God and the interpretation of scripture. I think it is clear that the second belief automatically leads to the first if a person loses faith. What is not clear is how there can be any clear morality when everything is a social construct. If the leftist belief in total malleability is true then any appeal to conscience makes no sense, and humans should just be power hungry sociopaths.
A third possibility exists, completely ignored and unknown, which is that because we have a shared evolution we have a shared automatic and instinctual morality, and that this thing called a conscience can actually be the basis for unifying moral code. This is basically a concept rooted in the subject of Evo Psych. If human nature is infinitely malleable then the concept of a conscience makes no sense, and appeals to conscience make no sense. Having a conscience is not necessarily contradictory with Christian morality since every human has a Divine spark within them.
It is possible to have a shared moral standard grounded in instinct because all humans convergently evolved an intuition of right and wrong, and since each human has 2 parents, 4 grandparents, 8 great grandparents, 16 great great grandparents, 32, 64, 128... 1,048,576 humanity is a genetic soup and therefore it is possible for a common humanity and human nature to exist.
Put it another way, we are all created from a part of genetic soup, every human is a bowl of soup taken from that pot. The distribution of carrots and onions in the soup may differ from one bowl to the next but any trait that you find in one bowl you will find in the whole pot and vice versa. The distribution of those traits will vary but not their existence.
This means that human nature is its own justification for political action. If I am territorial and find it offensive that men of a different race come into my society then everyone is territorial and finds it similarly offensive that men of a different race come into their territory. That is in the subconscious of everyone. Because the trait exists among everyone it becomes a rational grounds for policy. Psychological projection then, is not a fallacy but an intelligent policy making tool.
If I am territorial then all men are more or less territorial. If I am racist then all of are more or less racist. Put these trades will vary, so most humans for example are too dishonest to admit any of this (in the year 2025) because they have jobs and relationships held hostage by the current consensus and its violent enforcers. If liberalism depends on silence and critics who challenge the false notion of equality, then all systems are based on silencing critics. The fact that liberals are so racist towards conservatives and treat conservatives as if they were a race, the fact that the same cognitive structures of exclusion and contempt that enable the most passionate racism enables the most passionate hatred of conservatives, proves that hatred of difference is a universal human trait. But even without this example the bowl of soup metaphor would still hold, the bull is always a subset of the pot, and therefore any trait that exists within the bowl also exists in the pot. The very existence of intolerance proves that intolerance is a widespread human trait, and while this trait may vary in strength among individuals it is universal. The fact that liberals are some of the most intolerant people while believing they are the most tolerant proves that human self-deception is also a universal trait. Anything that is found in the whole will also be found in part of the whole. This, conservatives also have self-deceptive tendencies.
Human nature is itself a rational basis for both a moral code and a legislating doctrine. Since the negative trait exists of ______ whatever _______ it can form the basis of policy. This is true so long as the ultimate aim is to suppress monkey nature (the anarchist/leftist/communist desire to destroy). Suppression of the leftist is the ultimate aim of civilization. Humanity is and ought to be a farm of humans because the jungle is so much worse. The ultimate aim of the farm is to harness human nature to suppress anti-farm aspects of human nature. Anti-racism is anti-farm, since herds of humans are most effectively domesticated when they are uniform in color I'm high trust societies are societies of uniform animals.
Land acknowledgments are not a trivial thing. When people hear land acknowledgments they hear a declaration of fealty to a totalitarian regime of white self-hate. The left has constructed a decentralized form of totalitarianism within democracy. Democracy is supposed to represent the people, representative democracy is supposed to be a rather low temperature chilled-out form of government that routinely goes about the business of paving roads and delivering police services, and that is why people are still so indifferent to local government. They assume that their local government is carrying out the routine business of government but in reality in many places it has been completely hijacked by "woke" totalitarians. These people take the lie of equality so seriously that they believe in a kind of spiritual equality where the criminal continues to be innocent and have equal worth even after the crime they have committed. In fact they implicitly believe that the criminal has more worth because he is a victim of society and the "oppressed" are always superior. This is a complete contradiction because society is nothing more than individuals, to claim that the individual has no responsibility for their actions would be to claim that society has no responsibility for oppressing them. To claim that society is totally responsible for the actions of individuals, even drug addicts and the mentally ill, is to contradict the first claim that individuals are not responsible, but this little point is a digression.
Belief in the total malleability of humans is simultaneously the most socially maladaptive belief and also the most politically adaptive belief. If you believe in human nature then you have a natural limit on the power you can impose on people. Since human nature is only malleable up to a point, exceeding this point can be automatically characterized as tyranny. Indeed if humans have a nature even well before the point of infringing on their automatic nature you can be guilty of tyranny since they simply don't like it, don't like what you are doing, and will never like it. Acceptance of a fundamental human nature demands acceptance of limits on power and of democratic accountability. In a monarchy notions of fundamental human nature may be used as a justification for hierarchical power but in a democracy they represent a limitation on power. This is why fascist tendencies in a democracy can paradoxically lead to libertarian outcomes.
Fascism according to Benito Mussolini in The Doctrine Of Fascism, is the unity of all aspects of society within the state. Are you running a university? Great, the state will now determine your curriculum. Are you running a business? A government minder will supervise you. Got a chess club? You have to do the salute before you do the chess. Are you running the boy scouts? Cool now the boy scouts must be run according to fascist principles. And of course all of this is then unified in the personality of a dictator. Fascism, according to fascists, is complete unity within the state and complete control of the state by a personality.
The left has spent decades getting around the Constitutional Separation Of Church and State in order to construct a decentralized totalitarian system of so-called economic, racial, and social justice. This system routinely ignores the pleas of voters at city council meetings to stop destroying their communities by importing homeless people, drugs, facilitating gangs, refusing to prosecute crime, and so forth. This decentralized conspiracy infiltrates universities, high schools, grade schools, and even kindergartens and indoctrinates children to be transgender, to hate their own race, their Nation and their history. It subverts the reproduction of white people, brings in foreigners to vote and replace whites, brainwashes white women to turn against having children, attacks religion and God, hates Christianity, mothers, fathers, men, white men, white people, masculinity, infants who whine in public, normal heterosexual sex, reproduction, the gender binary, safe public spaces, clean streets, trains that run on time, the elderly (especially Baby Boomers), and anyone who polices social norms which they call Karens. It's various neurosis, hang-ups, and hatreds are well documented by everyone.
Since this has infiltrated everything and since it is decentralized in nature the promise of opposing it is the promise of libertarian fascism. That is, using a totalizing state to root out these communists from all institutions and impose a national curriculum of normalcy, replacement of Hollywood movie studio writers, and mass re-education and deprogramming of leftists. Of course power being what it is the most likely outcome will just be fascism, not libertarian fascism. The idea of libertarian fascism is to use fascism to expel totalitarianism from all institutions and then go back to democracy. This last part is unlikely to ever happen and so the totalitarians are actually justified in worrying about fascism, what they are not justified in doing is thinking that fascism is worse than what they're doing.
A thing can be tyrannical without being unified in the personality of the dictator. Monarchy is not the sole criteria of tyranny, and there have been liberal monarchs in the classic sense of the word liberal. But one can see a system where instead of having to sit through endless indoctrination about how horrible you are for being white (so that you may get the college degree and enter the middle class), you have to sit through mandatory classes in Christian theology (even if you are an atheist), and swear fealty to Israel to get your degree. People are really bad at cognitive dissonance, at the stress of believing one thing and saying another, and this is why power really is effective at imposing belief on people. This is why something like Islamic conquest can actually work at changing the beliefs of a population. In fact most widespread belief is a top-down historical enterprise a cultural conquest whether it is communist conquest and forced indoctrination of russia, communist conquest and forced indoctrination of China, islamic conquest and forced indoctrination of the entire Middle East, etc etc. Even native americans went to mandatory Christian school.
When the beliefs of the population are programmed by compulsory education and forced forms of media indoctrination, when The Message saturates all movies and TV, it is kind of hard to see what the point of freedom of speech is. People desperately need to regain control of their own moral narratives. In the ancient feudal village people formed their own narratives around the campfire. This is how values should be formed since values created by the community are far more trustworthy and productive of survival of that community than values imposed from above. The main way that values are passed from one generation to the next is through storytelling and having those stories written by anyone except the members of your own community is just begging to be colonized by your haters.
People should just run churches out of their houses, accept no cash donations, and invent their own stories. Christianity has become a big business in america and america has a tendency to convert all business and brands into religions, and all religions into businesses. The secret of american capitalism is that it isn't even really capitalism but more like occultism. Everything in this country converges on the business cult and cult business. You should regard any system that you don't control locally as fundamentally hostile to your existence. You should build up the capacity for cognitive dissonance, the capacity to say whatever the educational authorities want you to say while believing whatever you actually believe. You should incorporate a kind of soft minimal compliance with power into a exit in place, hide in plain sight. Everyone should train their children to just say whatever the teacher wants while believing things fundamentally different. You should educate your children in neoreaction even if you have to make them sit in front of a PowerPoint. You should put together a curriculum of based refutations and teach it to your kids after school, and share that curriculum among other parents. Your kids need to go to public high school, they need to know how to blend in, they need to learn the skill of hiding in plain sight from a young age. It needs to be second nature to them while their brains are still forming.
The name of the game is hiding in plain sight, code switching, having your own secret opinions among your family and friends while swearing fealty to whatever the fuck you're supposed to believe. This skill will work for you regardless of whether or not fascism or woke totalitarianism wins.
If you like my work please consider promoting it by linking to it on your website or other places around the internet.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Please keep it civil