The flaw behind all the other flaws

Liberal epistemology or whatever it's called, go something like this: 

• People with agency are responsible for everything including the crimes of others 
• People without agency are not responsible for even their own actions 
• Responsibility is bad, a source of personal anxiety, not a source of empowerment 
• All power should be vested in the hands of those without agency 

It's a lie of course. There is no such thing as an adult non-retarded human without some agency. Everyone is in fact always at least somewhat responsible and power without accountability is tyranny. To empower a victim is to give power to someone you can never hold accountable. This means the inevitable destiny of the liberal project is crybaby tyranny.

Those with agency cannot help but victimize those without agency. The very act of being hot, or successful, or capable, is going to make some loser jealous and marginalize them. If the girl wants the capable man and you're capable then the bitter loser will be marginalized by not getting pussy. Capable people always victimize those around them. 

And there's no avoiding it, because everything depends on the capable, because if you want your electricity to work and your water to flow, and your garbage to get picked up, you need capable people. If you want competent surgeons and bridges that don't collapse you need capable people. It is the destiny of the loser to feel like a victim.

In Johannesburg South Africa they can't keep the power on and the water flowing because they put blacks in charge of the utility companies. They promoted based on race instead of competence—they put losers in charge. 

The feeling of being a victim that you have when you are a loser is completely valid. YOU ARE A VICTIM if you are a loser and honestly there's no way for any system to function any other way. I suppose we should work hard to make the amount of abuse as minimal as possible but that is the same principle as "minimum deadly force" that the police operate on. 

Genetic engineering could achieve real equality by making the incapable, capable, but paradoxically the left hates that. Got to keep people incapable. I guess if you believe that high agency white men are literal demons you would oppose making everyone high agency on moral grounds.

The problem with worshiping the agency-less person is that if the whole world were reduced in its level of agency in order to abolish the "evil" of people with agency it would collapse the whole civilization. And it wouldn't even accomplish what it's supposed to accomplish—there are still chads and losers in the trailer park, even mental hospitals have high status patients the other inmates are trying to fuck. There is no abolishing the victimhood of the loser except by becoming a winner. Are you fat? Have you been to the gym lately?