You are probably guilty of rape, so are most men, so is Russell Brand

I remember back when I was a cop in the military there were these two people who got caught having drunk sex. There was a standing order that no one was allowed to have premarital sex while stationed in the Middle East out of respect for Islamic law. In order to avoid getting charged and having her career destroyed the woman accused the man of rape, and since she had had two alcoholic drinks it was ruled non-consensual. I don't know what happened to the man, but under military law a person cannot consent if they are intoxicated and even one drink counts as intoxication. The legal standard is much like the civilian standard in that rape is penetration with a penis or other thing such as a finger when the receiver is unwilling or unable to consent. That unable to consent part gets everyone since people have a lot of intoxicated sex and even one drink counts as intoxication. 

If you're reading this and you are male you are probably guilty of rape. Have you had drunk sex? Did you ever keep going after you were told to stop? Have you been told yes and then no? There are a myriad number of situations in which you are guilty. Is Brand a predator? Probably. He's bipolar and manic and I'm surprised he didn't use that as a defense. I guess being temporarily insane only counts when you strangle your two children with exercise bands (and are female or black). White men either never seem to get the same Insanity deal everyone else gets and our equal system.

Everyone knows all women are insane, and everyone knows that the insanity plea makes what you do morally acceptable, ergo, all women and only women can get away with murder. Oh and black men too sometimes, because... racism. 

I think when feminists said that all sex was rape they were on to something. Something as animalistic as sex does not submit itself to the sterile legalisms of Anglo culture. There has always been an excessively puritanical streak in American society and it keeps coming back over and over again like a bad STD. The species depends on sex for its continuation. I don't think it's possible to follow all the injunctions of feminism and all of its rules and regulations and keep the species going. If sex is rape, if rape is any number of a dozen things, then I don't see Anglos being permitted to survive as a race under the existing definition of rape. Feminism has done to sex what feminists did to kink: neuter it. The enteral Puritan cannot cope with their urges and so retreats into autistic moralizing about definitions and legalisms over something that is fundamentally too animalistic to ever work that way. At least the original Puritans allowed reproductive sex. The current ones are too neurotic to even tolerate that, having outlawed marital rape, and thus, marital sex, since all sex is rape, according to feminist law.

The legal definition of rape is itself the problem. The existence of the insanity plea is itself the problem. The absence of white male as a protected category under non-discrimination law is itself a problem.

The right would have to do something truly inspired like overhaul the definition of rape and throw out all the activists from the legal profession. Fat chance the cucks have of ever doing that. They have no faith in themselves and therefore no ability to form a consensus.