Those with very high A must control the statements of their surroundings to maintain control of the contents of their own minds.— Alrenous (@Alrenous) April 1, 2018
“Tolerance” is being take to its logical extremes at breakneck pace. We are compelled by our overlords to tell ourselves it’s all okay and that it’s harm reduction to let it play out this way rather than actively discouraging it.— gary (@plzbepatient) March 26, 2018
Antifa tranny killing itself pic.twitter.com/7tPv8m96Qv— spiritchef (@theeSpiritchef) March 26, 2018
Tissue culture “clean meat” already in 2018? I’ve long been looking forward to this.https://t.co/p41NR3NEZn— Richard Dawkins (@RichardDawkins) March 3, 2018
What if human meat is grown? Could we overcome our taboo against cannibalism? An interesting test case for consequentialist morality versus “yuck reaction” absolutism.
“Without God, there’s no objective morality.” If you think that’s an argument for God’s existence, go away & learn some logic.— Richard Dawkins (@RichardDawkins) October 11, 2017
''Good Without God,' Atheist Subway Ads Proclaim' by Jennifer Lee - NY Times - RichardDawkins.net http://bit.ly/1EBV2a— Richard Dawkins (@RichardDawkins) October 19, 2009
1. offensive truthThe four forms of information are not treated identically by human agents. If you tell a polite truth you will annoy people because you are being completely obvious. Everyone knows the polite truth. That is things like "the sky is blue." In contrast, offensive lies are never told unless to insult someone.
2. polite truth
3. offensive lies
4. polite lies
Distributed (cannot destroy it without destroying the whole thing).
Anonymous (no meatbags to extort).
It is profitable to some elites.
It's destruction might destabilize the economy.
Government employees have invested in it.
It is difficult to understand the technology (exploits human laziness).An anarchist project succeeds when it is distributed, anonymous, profitable to elites, and difficult to understand, and when its threatening nature is not advertised.
It's threatening nature was not advertised (unlike Cody Wilson or Richard Spencer).
It's implications were not immediately understandable by anyone except its creators.
Trusted third parties are lawyer magnets. https://t.co/Qw20QEND9K— Nick Szabo⚡️ (@NickSzabo4) March 13, 2018
She can't have HIV or any other incurable diseases.
She can't be a false rape accuser. Since that category includes many feminists, she can't be a feminist. A non-zero probability of being falsely accused of rape is still too high, even if most self-described feminists would not accuse a man of rape. Why take the chance when I can just screw some other chick?
She can't be a stalker.
She has to be HUMAN. No animals or aliens.
She has to be ALIVE. No dead girls.
She has to be a she.
She has to be awake.
At least 18+, or whatever the age of consent is.
She has to be consenting.
Has no mental problems.
Enjoys cooking, cleaning, and trad wife things.
Free of leftist indoctrination.
Horny but loyal.
And numerous other standards.
Which standard is he applying to me: the low standard or the high one?Horny men who don't care about marriage will exhibit impatience, disregard for your feelings, asshole behavior, lack of appreciation for wifely things, etc.