Congress is a marketplace for the purchasing of laws

Let us imagine that you install trading machines on the floor of the House and Senate. Each one of the 535 members of Congress set a quota for their yes vote and no vote. Let us say that the senator wants a particular issue to be voted "no," so the senator sets their no vote at a cheaper rate than their yes vote, oh say 3 million dollars for a "no" and 5 million for a "yes." The contributions then roll in and whichever of the two options for that senators vote reaches quota before the end of the trading day is how the senator votes. If both options reach quota prior to the end of the trading day then the senator is allowed to adjust their quota upwards for one or both votes. If neither yes or no reaches quota then the senator effectively abstains from voting. The Speaker can extend the trading day into the night in order to milk the market for more money. 

This is basically a more efficient version of how Congress currently operates. Congress, you see, is a marketplace for the purchasing of laws. 

The way it actually works is that a Senator is thinking about voting on a given issue. This is because the bill passes through committee and gets put on the docket by the Speaker or Majority Leader of the relevant house. In the meantime the senator is flooded with calls and emails and maybe even in person visits by various interest groups and activist groups that tell them things. One group says "we represent the petroleum industry and we think this bill is a bad idea." The petroleum industry group is of course giving him money and if he votes for the bill they will withdraw those contributions. It's the same with every group that meets with him. Everyone is either threatening to withdraw money, implying that they will bribe and give more money, or threatening to withdraw activist support. The senator is flooded with bribes and threats from dozens of sources trying to manipulate how they vote on each and every issue. A senator will sit there and count all the emails for and against a bill and tally up the amount of contributions that come from voting yes or no. They will also consider the fact that other senators are under the same pressure and that if they vote against a bill which is profitable to the other senators they may make enemies of them. There's a whole bunch of factors and political drama at play including not upsetting the Speaker or Majority Leader who's trying to buy their second yacht. The whole process is a drama-filled high stress high pressure sales environment with shifting alliances, frenemies, and snakes using each other to get ahead. It is of course completely sociopathic.

It is a far less efficient version of a trading floor with a lot more stress. Even threats of prosecution come into play. 

Now I want to make clear I'm not advocating that the floor of the House and Senate both have trading machines on them. I'm not advocating replacing the cannibalistic sausage making machine of Congress with a trading floor. Or maybe I am? Whatever, I just want the reader to understand how it works and a marketplace for the purchasing of laws is the most apt comparison.

Beyond the fact that these people are greedy and want to buy their fifth house, third yacht, and 20th sex trafficked underage girl, there is the issue of financing your next campaign. You see voters are apathetic retards who vote for candidates with name recognition. That means you have to buy the name recognition with advertising, and that means you need money, and lots of it. You need as much money as you can get because the other guy you're running against is going to spend as much as he can. You can't afford not to spend money. All this means is that voters are cooperating with the donor class by voting retardedly for whoever has the most name recognition. You would think voters would be smarter than that, you would think that they would research how their candidates voted and then vote based on the voting record of their candidates. You think they would care about consequences and results, but the voter is not only an apathetic retard but actively harmful to their own interests because by voting for name recognition they vote for the greatest sellouts and the only way you sell out is by worsening everyone's quality of life with corrupt legislation. The average retarded voter is an active participant in their own destruction and doesn't even know it. On top of that these idiots vote for incumbents who already have a 95% re-election rate. The most obvious way to get change in government policy is to change the government by voting out all incumbents. Do they do this? Of course not. These Congress people are also incredibly good at positioning themselves as unique and "challenging the system" while they underperform on their promises. In fact the whole purpose of being a fire brand is to position yourself as unfireable. You see, the voters all want more or less the same thing but you're going to have to betray them to keep those contributions rolling in, and you need those contributions so you can buy more child whores and purchase the name recognition and that game recognition is going to get you re-elected. Since all voters want pretty much the same thing there's no alpha in just giving people what they want. Being a rebellious fire brand who shits on the establishment is a great way to become the establishment. You want to make yourself unfireable and the way you do that is by making voters retardedly loyal no matter how much you fuck them. And the way you do that is by getting them ideologically committed beyond their own rational best interests.

Now you need to coordinate people because there's a lot of money and power in being able to control a large number of votes. The only real way to do that is to have some sort of devastating blackmail on each and every person you're trying to control. The blackmail has to be absolutely heinous so that it shakes voters out of their complacency and makes them actually vote against an incumbent. If homosexuality is stigmatized you can use that to control someone. If cheating on your wife is stigmatized you can use that to control someone. If child rape is stigmatized you can use that to control someone. The more uptight and stigmatized society is the easier it is to provoke outrage and the easier it is to form a conspiracy. Deconstructing societal values has the effect of forcing conspirators into ever more depraved behavior since there is less and less that provokes outrage. Maybe 50 years ago you could run a competent government on a conspiracy of homosexual men with fake heterosexual marriages to maintain appearances. Now that homosexuality is the stigmatized that will no longer work so controlling people require something more depraved, and this is why there's so many pedophiles in our government. 

Normalizing Nazism is actually kind of foolish if you think about it. Let us say you wanted to position a bunch of nationalists in the government back in 2016 when racism was still highly stigmatized. You could have had all your men make a private one-on-one video where they recite the 14 words and sieg heil on camera. Then you encrypt the videos and have only one person with access to them who is also the leader. If any of your men ever betray the mission you can release the video and embarrass them, costing them the election. Oh sure there will be investigations but if people are smart, keep their mouths shut, and don't talk to the police the remaining members of the organization can remain hidden in plain sight. You would employ a cell structure where all the members of the organization are oblivious to all the others, thus no one can point the finger at each other because they don't know anything to tell. There is one leader and only he knows who the members of the conspiracy are. You don't keep any written records of any of it except those encrypted videos on archival ceramic CDs that you keep under the floorboards, or sealed behind some drywall, or in a plastic wrapped safe buried in the woods. Basically if you want to defeat a conspiracy you have to create one.