Progressive values are capitalist values (and that's a bad thing)

There's a certain thing that happens when you hold a microphone up to a speaker. You hear this high pitched screeching sound caused by a tight feedback loop. That's basically what it's like have a donor class running your government. You have money running the government which in turn makes the laws governing money. The result is a deranged screeching dysfunction in the whole society. 

In a capitalist society the smart thing to do is to undermine the competition. Since you're in sexual competition with your own children you should undermine the next generation. Since you are in competition with other women you should fill their heads with toxic ideas about men and dating. You should tell them to walk away from any relationship over the most trivial thing. You should encourage other women to be totally insufferable in order to make them unmarriageable. You should subvert young women because you can subvert the competition that way. You should promote toxic ideologies because that will destroy the competition. You should corrode all the values and traditions of society because those traditions are altruistic and interfere with pure unadulterated evil competition. 

Teaching young men to castrate themselves and become transgender subverts the competition. Teaching women to be insufferable bitches subverts the competition. Importing tens of millions of violent foreigners increases competition. Every single progressive value is a capitalist value (and that's a bad thing obviously).

When Karl Marx wasn't beating his wife and mistress and abandoning his children to starve, when he wasn't mooching off of Engles and refusing to work, the jew was praising capitalism for not going far enough at destroying the traditions and values of the white society around him. People forget that the only reason Marx hated capitalism was because it didn't go far enough. Well if he has lived long enough to see his people climb into power and spread their values he would be very satisfied. Are modern Boomer values capitalist or jewish?

Yes. Yes on both counts. Progressives do this thing where they hate capitalism but love all its (anti) values. Conservatives do this thing where they love capitalism but hate all it's values. This weird split is what happens when you allow yourself to be colonized by a hostile foreign tribe who defines all your values on both sides of the aisle. A more natural division would be between socialist traditionalist patriarchs on one side, versus capitalist transhumanists feminist semite cretans on the other. The log never chops along its natural seam because jews are always there to distort each side. Both sides have been pozzed. A very simple heuristic you can ask yourself to determine whether something is good or evil is, "what are the results?" People are putting "morals" first when they should be determining results first. When a hostile tribe controls your morals you have to start putting pragmatism before ethics, and rebuild your moral system from a deep understanding of the social good. Morals should be developed after the general good of everyone is considered and the best morals do not require a person to choose between individual rights, the family, and the nation, but rather manage to serve the good of all of them. Following abstract principles without considering the consequences is deranged. Watch Star Trek TNG if you want to see a deranged moralfag in charge of a spaceship.

I have praised capitalism in the past and this may create confusion. No doubt uncorrupted capitalism has many superior benefits and may even be a superior system to the alternatives but the problem is that it has an enormous attack surface for being hijacked by foreign interest, and once foreign interests get a hold of your economy you're screwed. Fascism, socialism, monarchism, feudalism—are all systems of power above money while capitalism is a system of money above power. This creates the screech and feedback loop because winners in the capitalist system wind up writing the very laws that govern the markes. It turns capitalism into a system with a limited lifespan, kind of like how anarchism is only a temporary state. If the winners of the game writes the rules then the game doesn't stay a game for long. As a game, capitalism wants to abolish itself since the winners use campaign contributions to control politicians and destroy the game because they are tired of competing. The book Zero to One by Peter Thiel my body is this mentality and says "competition is for losers." The ultimate victory in the market is to force your customer to buy your product, and not to compete.

In order for capitalism to function permanently it would have to be reset periodically by canceling all the debts and redistributing the most highly concentrated wealth back to the bottom. It can't do that because it gets control of the lawmakers, and because of its vast attack surface it gets hijacked by Zionists, and then hijacks your government. Power-above-money systems may indeed be less prosperous (in the beginning) than capitalism, but their attack surface is much smaller and it is clear who has power, the number of people with power is fewer, and if the person or people with power are malevolent it is much easier to take them out.

I have had jewish friends and I want to make clear that I do not think jewish people are inherently evil. But as I wrote a long time ago—back when I was still in atheist, religion is a form of transmittable mental illness. While I no longer believe this is true for Christianity I see no reason to think it isn't true for all the other religions. Every religion is like downloading the mind of the founder into your head. If there is a single defect in the thought process of the founder it will be propagated into the minds of his believers for all time as long as that religion exists. Judaism believes in Tikkun Olam, or repairing the world. Zionists believe this is more than just repairing the world but controlling it. Whatever the case, everyone else is going to interpret it as meddling in their affairs, and meddling while being a foreign tribe is a great way to make everyone hate you. Moreover I do not think judaism is capable of true pragmatism. A rational and intelligent man is born into it a jewish family. He looks around and concludes that if he stays jewish his children or grandchildren might be exterminated so he does the smart thing and converts to literally any other religion. Even if the conversion is only superficial he brings his children up to sincerely believe something else—anything else, other than judaism. As a faith judaism is an entire religion living in defiance of acknowledging reality. Because the smartest most intelligent thing to do is to simply leave the faith behind prioritize genetic survival. The fact they don't do this leads to pervasive cognitive error and that error combined with a mandate to meddle in the world, combined with their history, produces this thing that gets itself killed. I don't know how else to put it, but something in the water, something in the ideology, will always lead jews back to getting shoah'd.

Let me put it another way: Muslims are going to blow themselves up because that's what their transmittable mental illness does. Hindus are going to throw feces and pollute the Ganges River because that's what their religion does. Scientologists are going to jump on couches and sue you because that's what scientology does. Mormons are going to knock on your door, that's just what they do, and jews are going to get shoah'd. A religion is a personality transmitted to all its adherents through a book. Every member of religion is kind of like the Unity organism from Rick and Morty, and they are all one mind. If a religion has the personality of an annoying kid that gets pushed in lockers by bullies you don't download that personality into your head. To study a religion is to adopt the personality inherent within it, is to download the personality into your mind, is to become it. To some extent all scientologists are L Ron Hubbard. To some extent all Muslims are warlords. To some extent all buddhists are layabouts who sit under a tree. To some extent all jews are annoying locker kids. Some of them grow up and become the better genocidal Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, but they all started in lockers.

Let's tie it all together because I've made a bunch of different points here. 

Putting the donor class in charge of the government puts capitalism in charge of itself and creates a tight screeching feedback loop of madness. It creates a wide attack surface for hijacking by a foreign tribe. The tribe and then hijacks your capitalism which lets them hijack your government. Religion is a form of transmittable mental illness and never is this more true than with the tribe that hijacks you. Pure free market capitalism might very well produce some superior results but like anarchy it is a temporary state before corruption sets in. Each side in the culture war has been pozzed by introducing a corrosive component into it. In the case of conservatives this corrosive component is addiction to the economics of capitalism, while in the case of liberals it's addiction to the anti-values of capitalism. This creates a deadlock enabling the tribe to stifle revolutionary energy and preventing a resolution into some sort of culture-preserving outcome. The deadlock enables the corrosion of your values, your culture, and your women. Without a French style revolution against the donor class no amount of progress is possible. They are the giant paper weight holding the door of mass immigration open. They used their Epstein Island blackmail on Trump to turn MAGA into MIGA. It seems the entire Neoreactionary sphere (of which I was a part) was this giant sci-op to put a small group of Zionists in charge of America. Either it was that way from day one or they hijacked the revolution. Whatever the case it only makes me more angry and willing to fight. It seems like we white nationalists are destined to ally ourselves in a multiracial struggle against international jewish power. We are fighting a struggle to de-colonize our nations of foreign power and that is an awkward spot to be in.

"A revolution does not march a straight line. It wanders where it can, retreats before superior forces, advances wherever it has room, attacks whenever the enemy retreats or bluffs, and above all, is possessed of enormous patience." 

— Mao Zedong